This probably sounds really stupid and selfish. But it's been bugging me for months...and something that does that surely needs some form of address, right? ...right?
I'm a member of a small literary society. <40 members. We have a Wiki which is (supposed to be) kept up to date about our shenanigans.
I say 'supposed to be' because very few of the people know what they're doing with the Wiki. These few people are the ones who do all the work, who know all the Wikicode and how to update tables and templates and upload pictures into the right categories and such. We update whenever a new fic is produced; and we update whenever others ask us to (usually in the form of moaning on Facebook that something is wrong and needs to be fixed). We have received little to no recognition of what we do.
And whenever we have a serious problem that requires admin powers, we have to message them for help and then wait until they do their something-like weekly check. We have a dormant issue with an awful grammar-troll who is not a member of our society, and we had some serious disruptive trolls earlier this year.
We have three admins. One has had to sort out her life and has unfortunately had to drop out of the Society. She founded the Wiki and I trust her to come back and help when we need her, so I'm not mad at her. It's the other two.
One has just over 200 edits (five times less than myself), knows no Wikicode at all (by her own admission) and demands that we hard-working Wikigardeners do her work for her, and even then I have to fix her mistakes. The other has TWENTY-FOUR edits, is inactive (has not edited for over ninety-one days), has only ever edited articles that relate to his own characters. The first admin has declared that giving sysop (she didn't even know what that meant until I told her - she said she thought it was cough medicine) to anyone else is a useless endeavour because she is sure the three can take care of any problem. She dips in and out of inactivity herself, and while she has the power to take care of the problems we often have to poke her through other channels and wait for her to get round to it to do so.
I know these two personally. They're an item. He lives in the US and I haven't met him personally; she we see regularly. They're only admins in the first place because of the virtue of their characters being the head honchos of the society.
Am I wrong in thinking our leadership sucks monkey biscuits? If we ever have a problem where we need to contact the Wiki staff, we have nobody apart from the admin who's left to speak for us, because the other two don't have enough edits nor are active enough. I know it's a hobby endeavour, something silly and unmonitored and unpaid, just to maintain a database for the society. But it's really annoying. What should I do?
I'm a member of a small literary society. <40 members. We have a Wiki which is (supposed to be) kept up to date about our shenanigans.
I say 'supposed to be' because very few of the people know what they're doing with the Wiki. These few people are the ones who do all the work, who know all the Wikicode and how to update tables and templates and upload pictures into the right categories and such. We update whenever a new fic is produced; and we update whenever others ask us to (usually in the form of moaning on Facebook that something is wrong and needs to be fixed). We have received little to no recognition of what we do.
And whenever we have a serious problem that requires admin powers, we have to message them for help and then wait until they do their something-like weekly check. We have a dormant issue with an awful grammar-troll who is not a member of our society, and we had some serious disruptive trolls earlier this year.
We have three admins. One has had to sort out her life and has unfortunately had to drop out of the Society. She founded the Wiki and I trust her to come back and help when we need her, so I'm not mad at her. It's the other two.
One has just over 200 edits (five times less than myself), knows no Wikicode at all (by her own admission) and demands that we hard-working Wikigardeners do her work for her, and even then I have to fix her mistakes. The other has TWENTY-FOUR edits, is inactive (has not edited for over ninety-one days), has only ever edited articles that relate to his own characters. The first admin has declared that giving sysop (she didn't even know what that meant until I told her - she said she thought it was cough medicine) to anyone else is a useless endeavour because she is sure the three can take care of any problem. She dips in and out of inactivity herself, and while she has the power to take care of the problems we often have to poke her through other channels and wait for her to get round to it to do so.
I know these two personally. They're an item. He lives in the US and I haven't met him personally; she we see regularly. They're only admins in the first place because of the virtue of their characters being the head honchos of the society.
Am I wrong in thinking our leadership sucks monkey biscuits? If we ever have a problem where we need to contact the Wiki staff, we have nobody apart from the admin who's left to speak for us, because the other two don't have enough edits nor are active enough. I know it's a hobby endeavour, something silly and unmonitored and unpaid, just to maintain a database for the society. But it's really annoying. What should I do?
Comment