http://consumerist.com/2010/02/no-yo....html#comments
The site has a poll asking readers if they agree or disagree, so far over 60% say the man should get his ridiculously cheap cereal.
The person with the complaint notes the actual price of $2.50 was CORRECT on the tag but the unit pricing was messed up. I don't see this as a valid pricing error.
The site has a poll asking readers if they agree or disagree, so far over 60% say the man should get his ridiculously cheap cereal.
The person with the complaint notes the actual price of $2.50 was CORRECT on the tag but the unit pricing was messed up. I don't see this as a valid pricing error.
Comment