Quoth Gravekeeper
View Post
Except for the religious aspects, one clever notion I saw in an op-ed piece quite a few years ago was this: pay women to not have children. The proponent had fairly extensive numbers to back up his thesis, but the gist was that there would be an actual reduction in overall welfare and ADC costs if you gave every woman from 14 to 24 a certain amount each year they didn't have a child, and the amount compounded by the year. No kid this year, $100. No kid last year and this year, $200. The actual amounts were higher, and tied to what would be saved, but seemed like a pretty good proposition.
I liked it 'cause it was completely voluntary, but since I can think of about ten SCish objections right off the top of my head, I don't suppose it was ever seriously considered.
Quoth edible_hat
View Post
Comment