Customer is stupid pissed, emphasize the stupid.
Customer and spouse both have cards to the same credit line. Spouse loses his card, which is okay because we give different card numbers to both. So we can blocked his card, issue a new one for him, and NOT block her card. Not super happy about the 5-day wait for a new card, but customer is okay.
Except then, as standard with a lost card, we ask customer to look over recent transactions to make certain everything is authorized.
Customer discovers an unrecognized charge for $5.14. Problem is, the charge used her card number, not the number of the missing spouse.
Verify that the charge is definitely fraudulent. Okay, going to have to block her card also and run a dispute so we can get the $5.14 refunded. Such a small amount is an easy dispute, but now we're having to replace both cards.
NOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
She cannot LIVE without her card for five days.
What if she has an emergency?!
What if she wants to watch a pay-per-view movie tonight?! [direct quote]
We are NOT to block the card until she has received her new card. NOT, NOT, NOT.
So, now we get to the polite legal explanations. Not going to try to repeat it word for word, but basically: if you want a card that you are aware is compromised (and we are aware that you know) to remain open, you waive your rights to dispute both the current fraudulent charge and any future fraudulent charges. We require you to either sign a written statement or state on a recorded line that you are choosing to keep the card open and accept that you are liable for any and all fraudulent charges placed on the card, including the one already made.
Now comes the s***storm. We are holding her hostage over $5.14! [again, direct quote] No she will not take responsibility for any charges that might occur, but we are not allowed to block her card without her permission!
NO, she does not want to hear why again. She has heard all the explanations but they do not match her view of how things should go so she refuses to hear any more and we are to LISTEN to her because she is the customer and she is upset and this is not right and we are killing her puppies and eating them for desert and laughing about it and we're probably all Natzies and Hitler too! [okay, this part might not be a direct quote]
Eventually she storms out.
She comes back a few hours later for repeat addendum after discovering that her card has, in fact, been blocked. Yeah, cause you didn't waive liability Miss Sucky and continued to state that the charge was fraudulent. You storming out does not equate to you getting your way.
And yeah, my manager DOES support me. Non-negotiable compliance with our credit card processor overrules you.
The kicker:
Customer has another credit card with us. Completely separate, non-compromised credit card with a zero balance, and she has the active card sitting in her wallet. But, see, she doesn't want to use THAT card.
Customer and spouse both have cards to the same credit line. Spouse loses his card, which is okay because we give different card numbers to both. So we can blocked his card, issue a new one for him, and NOT block her card. Not super happy about the 5-day wait for a new card, but customer is okay.
Except then, as standard with a lost card, we ask customer to look over recent transactions to make certain everything is authorized.
Customer discovers an unrecognized charge for $5.14. Problem is, the charge used her card number, not the number of the missing spouse.
Verify that the charge is definitely fraudulent. Okay, going to have to block her card also and run a dispute so we can get the $5.14 refunded. Such a small amount is an easy dispute, but now we're having to replace both cards.
NOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
She cannot LIVE without her card for five days.
What if she has an emergency?!
What if she wants to watch a pay-per-view movie tonight?! [direct quote]
We are NOT to block the card until she has received her new card. NOT, NOT, NOT.
So, now we get to the polite legal explanations. Not going to try to repeat it word for word, but basically: if you want a card that you are aware is compromised (and we are aware that you know) to remain open, you waive your rights to dispute both the current fraudulent charge and any future fraudulent charges. We require you to either sign a written statement or state on a recorded line that you are choosing to keep the card open and accept that you are liable for any and all fraudulent charges placed on the card, including the one already made.
Now comes the s***storm. We are holding her hostage over $5.14! [again, direct quote] No she will not take responsibility for any charges that might occur, but we are not allowed to block her card without her permission!
NO, she does not want to hear why again. She has heard all the explanations but they do not match her view of how things should go so she refuses to hear any more and we are to LISTEN to her because she is the customer and she is upset and this is not right and we are killing her puppies and eating them for desert and laughing about it and we're probably all Natzies and Hitler too! [okay, this part might not be a direct quote]
Eventually she storms out.
She comes back a few hours later for repeat addendum after discovering that her card has, in fact, been blocked. Yeah, cause you didn't waive liability Miss Sucky and continued to state that the charge was fraudulent. You storming out does not equate to you getting your way.
And yeah, my manager DOES support me. Non-negotiable compliance with our credit card processor overrules you.
The kicker:
Customer has another credit card with us. Completely separate, non-compromised credit card with a zero balance, and she has the active card sitting in her wallet. But, see, she doesn't want to use THAT card.
Comment