What strikes me as funny is, despite all the registers being handicapped (and one wheelchair) accessible -- one with only one person at it -- she still wanted her own lane opened. It almost sounds like she just wanted a self-serve lane opened so she could steal something (if nothing embarassing's in the cart, there's not really any other reason).
Then she decided to redefine the law to say that handicapped people should get whatever they want no matter what -- and if they don't you're not being accessible and violating the law.
Then she decided to redefine the law to say that handicapped people should get whatever they want no matter what -- and if they don't you're not being accessible and violating the law.
Comment