Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GAME: Celebrity Scandal Pool!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Not scandal, but I do notice one of my 3 has had his name all over front pages and news websites... even written about on here as a thread... John Travolta. Got me a bit shocked... I mean, only 2 days into the year.....
-
My picks
Tara Reid like shooting fish in a barrel
Mariah Carey
Madonna
Leave a comment:
-
No, not at all. I think it's hilarious that you chose a corpse, but totally within the rules. And the reason I think it's hilarious is that, while there ARE scandals involving dead people, it tends to be easier for people to fuck up and do something stupid when they're still breathing. But that's just my opinion, and as always, I reserve the right to be completely, horribly, and embarrasingly wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
Congratulations, Severen, you are the first person to choose a corpse! (It was bound to happen eventually.)
Um, did I do something wrong? Your own rules said the celebrity does not have to be alive:
9. The celebrity does not have to be alive. Scandals do pop up concerning dead celebrities. However, the living are far more likely to fuck up, so take this into consideration when making your picks.
Leave a comment:
-
OK, SO says he wants
Jim Carrey - just has a feeling things have been going too smoothley for him
Winona Ryder - Odds are against her
David hasselhoff - he sees something happening with him this year
Leave a comment:
-
Congratulations, Severen, you are the first person to choose a corpse! (It was bound to happen eventually.)Quoth Severen13 View PostAnna Nicole Smith--She died nearly 2 years ago, but we haven't heard the last from her.
Reminder: Controversy is NOT the same as scandal. Just saying.
UPDATE: If we don't get a bunch more people in this soon (and they don't have to be CSers, you can have your friends play), I AM going to broaden the Pool and give everyone participating more picks. We have not even begun to delve into the sordid world of Celebrities yet, kids.
Leave a comment:
-
Pamela Anderson--who will she marry and divorce in 2009???
Charlie Sheen--the guy spent tens of thousands of dollars on hookers. What else has he done that we don't know about....yet?
Anna Nicole Smith--She died nearly 2 years ago, but we haven't heard the last from her.
Leave a comment:
-
The one on the radio, who said that 99% of kids with autism are faking it.Quoth Jester View PostMysty, I need you to tell me which Michael Savage you are referring to. Since I have never heard of him, I did a quick net search, and came up with several Michael Savages. I have two politicians, a musician, and a commentator/author.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Views_e...Michael_Savage <--that one.
I won't say anything further for Fratching's sake, and no one else should, either, but yeah. I fucking hate that guy. I pick him because I WANT him to go down in flames.
Leave a comment:
-
Mysty, I need you to tell me which Michael Savage you are referring to. Since I have never heard of him, I did a quick net search, and came up with several Michael Savages. I have two politicians, a musician, and a commentator/author.Quoth MystyGlyttyr View PostAnd just because I hate him so fucking much, Michael Savage.
Leave a comment:
-
All right, I'll go with what I know. Though these are three dark horses, I just don't know of too many other people.
Vince McMahon (although this could be iffy...though he regularly pisses off the wrestling world, he doesn't cross over into mainstream scandal unless he's really feeling his oats. I'll keep in mind that just because he gets us wrestlers up in a tizzy, that I still need to watch for someone "normal" to report it.)
Rush Limbaugh. I like Rush, since I accept him for what he is, a conservatively-politically based entertainer. But he does have some skeletons in the closet.
And just because I hate him so fucking much, Michael Savage. This is more hope that he goes down than anything.
Leave a comment:
-
My bets are:
Keira Knightley... just this idea she's really going to say/do something she really shouldn't...
John Travolta. I think the potential has always been there, he's just managed to avoid it.
Dick Cheney... big backpedal will be needed.
(I'd say one of the Hiltons, but I'm thinking it's just same shit, different day - though Nikki just might drop a bombshell to put her big sis to shame... ok, not possible, but still big enough
)
Leave a comment:
-
I use them because, yes, they are new, no they are not, as yet, coupled with each other [though rumours have started], and because the series is so famous, they will definitely be in the limelight... Bound to make these young stars crack like it has so many others
Leave a comment:
-
It is a lot of eggs in one basket, and potentially negative, yes, but I like the way RHPG is thinking in this sense: she is going after new celebrities, who are not necessarily used to fame or money that is suddenly coming their way, and who are relatively young. That all adds up to lots of potential for all kinds of chaos.
Leave a comment:
-
Putting all your eggs in one basket, eh? May be smart. May be foolish. We'll see next year, won't we?Quoth RedHeadPhoneGirl View PostOK, I'm gonna have to go with:
Robert Pattinson, Kristin Stewart, and Nikki Reed [Edward Cullen, Bella Swan, and Rosalie hale], three of the main cast members of the Twilight series. They've made lots of headlines this year, and with the series taking off the way it is, I can see them coming in with scandal....
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: