Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So, how big is an exabyte?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So, how big is an exabyte?

    I got bored, and did some math. One exabyte is fricking huge.

    Here's the scale: Drives were measured in kilobytes, then megabytes, then gigabytes, now terabytes. Next up is petabytes, and then comes exabytes.

    One exabyte is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes. That 10^18 bytes. But how big is this?

    If you wanted to store one exabyte of data, then that would take 500,000 2T drives. A typical server rack could handle 15 of them across (oriented vertically), and store 20 rows of that. To store all 500,000 drives, you would need 1,667 racks. Mind you, that would not store any servers. You just have the drives sitting in there.

    If you need to send one exabyte of data, then your fastest method is to use a Boeing 747, loaded up with DVDs. Using 4.7G DVDs in slimline jewel cases, you can fit 74T of data in one 747. So, one cross country trip, you get 74T of data delivered.

    So, to send that exabyte of data using 747s, you would need to fill up 13,513 747s with those DVDs. Measured end to end, those 747s would be 640.25 miles (1031km).

    That's a lot of data. Damn. And we're heading towards being able to store that much data within my lifetime.

  • #2
    Wouldn't USB or SD be more space-efficient than DVDs?
    Of course, I may be wrong, and even if I'm right your point about an exabyte being huge still stands.
    Last edited by taurinejunkie; 04-26-2010, 07:00 PM.
    Long days, short nights, a bottle of NOS makes it all right.

    Canadians Unite !

    Comment


    • #3
      So what you're saying is that we're heading toward storage of data being the same size as ENIAC? Do we really need to keep all that?
      Make a list of important things to do today.
      At the top of your list, put 'eat chocolate'
      Now, you'll get at least one thing done today

      Comment


      • #4
        Holy crap, I can't even wrap my mind around that one.

        Comment


        • #5
          ....I WANT ONE.

          Ridiculous 2009 Predictions: Evil Queen will beat Martha Stewart to death with a muffin pan. All hail Evil Queen! (Some things don't need elaboration.....) -- Jester

          Ridiculous 2010 Predictions: Evil Queen, after escaping prison for last years prediction, goes out and waffle irons Rachel Ray to death. -- SG15Z

          Ridiculous 2011 Prediction: Evil Queen will beat Gordon Ramsay over the head with a cast-iron skillet. -- FireHeart

          Comment


          • #6
            This is a neat calculation.

            To add to the server rack bit: At work, we're building multi chassis eSAS backup servers. Each chassis is 4u - 1u is about the size of a pizza box, height wise, and a bit wider than that. Each chassis holds 36 drives, 24 on front, and the other 12 on back. Each multi chassis server is 6 4u chassis, so 216 drives in this configuration. We are filling these chassis with 2TB drives. That is 432TB of storage for EACH server. Shy of half a petabyte. For one exabyte, we'd need over 2,000 of these backup servers. This is the chassis we use: http://www.supermicro.com/products/c...847A-R1400.cfm

            We get cases of 2TB drives straight from the manufacturer. At last count, there were about 20 cases of drives. Each case holds 20 2TB drives, so 40TB per case, so 800TB in the stack we have in the NOC at the moment. It's neat to get to handle this much storage. :-D
            Coworker: Distro of choice?
            Me: Gentoo.
            Coworker: Ahh. A Masochist. I thought so.

            Comment


            • #7
              So, in basic terms, it would hold about the whole world's supply of on-line pr0n.



              B
              "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."- Albert Einstein.
              I never knew how happy paint could make people until I started selling it.

              Comment


              • #8
                And to think, my first top-o-the-line computer in 1997 had 4WHOLE GIGS AND 1/2 GIG OF RAM!!! I had a slue of space!!!
                Dull women have immaculate homes.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Quoth Exaspera View Post
                  And to think, my first top-o-the-line computer in 1997 had 4WHOLE GIGS AND 1/2 GIG OF RAM!!! I had a slue of space!!!
                  my first machine was an Apple 2E with 16K of RAM, 1MHz 6502 CPU, no hard drive, and a single 1.2M 5.25" floppy drive. This machine is a 2 X dual core 2.66GHz Intel Xeon, with 1TB of space, and 4GB of RAM. It's aging gracefully at 4 years old. :-)
                  Coworker: Distro of choice?
                  Me: Gentoo.
                  Coworker: Ahh. A Masochist. I thought so.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I've got one machine with a 2-terabyte RAID-5 array. It's made out of five identical 500GB disks - remembering that with RAID-5, one disk worth of space is used for coping with a future disk failure. I got four of the disks cheap - *very* cheap - from the "refurbished" pile.

                    I have another machine with 4GB RAM and 1GB VRAM. It presently only has 32GB of disk, but that's because I'm playing with an SSD. Normally it has about half a terabyte across two independent disks.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Heh. My first "machine" was a dumb terminal with a modem attached that was marginally more powerful and ran at a swift 2400 baud.

                      The current has 4GB of RAM and a 600GB drive. The 1TB drive is for external storage.

                      ^-.-^
                      Faith is about what you do. It's about aspiring to be better and nobler and kinder than you are. It's about making sacrifices for the good of others. - Dresden

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        And that's only assuming the "marketing" format of an exabyte which is done in base 10, as opposed to the technical format which is a base 2. It has a tendency of being very different numbers the higher up you go.
                        I AM the evil bastard!
                        A+ Certified IT Technician

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hm, and exabyte hard drive? Cool I'll take 5!

                          lol, My spell check doesn't recognize "exabyte".

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The first hard drive I worked with had a capacity of 173,328 bits. Built by Singer for the Minuteman missiles. 8" platter, 2-3 PC boards on top of the platter and a doubled-fist sized motor under it.

                            We used it to store 6-bit brightness values for stage lighting 80-200 channels, 200 cues. (circa 1970-1977)
                            I am not an a**hole. I am a hemorrhoid. I irritate a**holes!
                            Procrastination: Forward planning to insure there is something to do tomorrow.
                            Derails threads faster than a pocket nuke.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              First computer I had (and still do) was a TI 99-4/A. No hard drive, 16 bits of memory...just enough to play Attack or TI Invaders
                              Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. --Enzo Ferrari

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X