We've done commercials, have any tv shows made you want to scream because you know it can come back and haunt you soon? Sitcoms, reality shows, whatever!
Let's "Improve" this photo!
This one was tonight on a interior decorating show. To fit the "Victorian" theme they were creating in a bedroom, an old photo of the husband's grandma was made to look like the cameos from that time period.
The problem? The designer took this photo, in pristine condition, and ripped the edges off to form a rough oval and then spray-mounted it on to their canvas! This was an original photo probably about 60-75 years old, and she destroyed it! Ok, grandma was still ok in the photo, but do that to a copy, not to an original of that age!
I get people bringing in photos even 20 years old full of cracks and bends and tears that I do restoration work on at my photo job. It's costly, it takes a lot of time, and it's never quite as good as the original. So to deliberately destroy something that is really rare and valuable - a photo that old in such good condition really
me. I hope nobody else tries it and messes up and then expects me to fix it!
Isn't technology Great?
The second really notable thing happened years ago. It was another design-type show, but about cleaning out and organizing and stuff. The host sent the couple to a hotel (it was a 2-day show) with a box of stuff to do - including organizing photos.
Ok, no biggie - except he told them to throw away the negatives because "you don't need those any more!"
Wanna bet? It's going to cost you four times more to make a photo from a print instead of a negative (unless we take pity on you) and the quality is never quite as good. Dust, color, fingerprints, wear and tear, not to mention the fact that you are copying what is a copy. Please, save your originals - the negatives!
Let's "Improve" this photo!
This one was tonight on a interior decorating show. To fit the "Victorian" theme they were creating in a bedroom, an old photo of the husband's grandma was made to look like the cameos from that time period.
The problem? The designer took this photo, in pristine condition, and ripped the edges off to form a rough oval and then spray-mounted it on to their canvas! This was an original photo probably about 60-75 years old, and she destroyed it! Ok, grandma was still ok in the photo, but do that to a copy, not to an original of that age!
I get people bringing in photos even 20 years old full of cracks and bends and tears that I do restoration work on at my photo job. It's costly, it takes a lot of time, and it's never quite as good as the original. So to deliberately destroy something that is really rare and valuable - a photo that old in such good condition really
me. I hope nobody else tries it and messes up and then expects me to fix it!Isn't technology Great?
The second really notable thing happened years ago. It was another design-type show, but about cleaning out and organizing and stuff. The host sent the couple to a hotel (it was a 2-day show) with a box of stuff to do - including organizing photos.
Ok, no biggie - except he told them to throw away the negatives because "you don't need those any more!"
Wanna bet? It's going to cost you four times more to make a photo from a print instead of a negative (unless we take pity on you) and the quality is never quite as good. Dust, color, fingerprints, wear and tear, not to mention the fact that you are copying what is a copy. Please, save your originals - the negatives!

I AM the evil bastard!


ing builders, engineers, and electricians in, who are getting a $3000 payday (in tools) for one week of work, they build the house around the tastes of the people who live there, the construction meets CODE, and they have an interior designer come in to put the finishing touches on it.
Comment