Hello peeps and those more educated than me...I have a medical query (no it's not for advice, fear not!)
My housemate has asthma. She wheezes sometimes; stairs, distance walking and hills can be a right nuisance, her coughs sound like WW3 and her breathing is off. I might be exaggerating, but it's not as clear as mine who doesn't have asthma. She has a Ventolin (salbutamol) inhaler which she carries everywhere and uses as necessary, which as it's now getting colder is at least once a week ish. Most of the time she's fine, but she has triggers which set her off needing her puffer - aerosols, smoke, exertion etc.
She's got a chest infection
which I'm playing nursemaid for. Now she has panic attacks and I was so worried this morning that I made an appointment to see the nurse, lovely woman who was able to calm the Emsie down and we went back home. But there was an issue which made her a little upset; because she's not on Becatide (sp? the brown preventative inhalers) the surgery deem her 'not asthmatic'.
She has a family history of asthma - her grandfather and mother both have it and for them it has got worse as they've got older. They have both been placed on Becatide, though they both have other medical issues too. She has attacks; she had one yesterday in the middle of Sainsburys for which we had to call the First-Aider (who was dressed in an awesome black and red Vampire outfit for the day ^^). I know for things like epilepsy one can have seizures and not be epileptic unless they meet certain other criteria.
She thinks this exculsion because she is not needing the preventative is ridiculous. I, who always tends to argue dialectics/to reach a common ground, thinks it may be for data purposes or something. But why is this definition in place, and what does it mean for her? It's a lot of conflicting information as she has the symptoms and half the meds but not the name. What's the truth?
My housemate has asthma. She wheezes sometimes; stairs, distance walking and hills can be a right nuisance, her coughs sound like WW3 and her breathing is off. I might be exaggerating, but it's not as clear as mine who doesn't have asthma. She has a Ventolin (salbutamol) inhaler which she carries everywhere and uses as necessary, which as it's now getting colder is at least once a week ish. Most of the time she's fine, but she has triggers which set her off needing her puffer - aerosols, smoke, exertion etc.
She's got a chest infection
which I'm playing nursemaid for. Now she has panic attacks and I was so worried this morning that I made an appointment to see the nurse, lovely woman who was able to calm the Emsie down and we went back home. But there was an issue which made her a little upset; because she's not on Becatide (sp? the brown preventative inhalers) the surgery deem her 'not asthmatic'. She has a family history of asthma - her grandfather and mother both have it and for them it has got worse as they've got older. They have both been placed on Becatide, though they both have other medical issues too. She has attacks; she had one yesterday in the middle of Sainsburys for which we had to call the First-Aider (who was dressed in an awesome black and red Vampire outfit for the day ^^). I know for things like epilepsy one can have seizures and not be epileptic unless they meet certain other criteria.
She thinks this exculsion because she is not needing the preventative is ridiculous. I, who always tends to argue dialectics/to reach a common ground, thinks it may be for data purposes or something. But why is this definition in place, and what does it mean for her? It's a lot of conflicting information as she has the symptoms and half the meds but not the name. What's the truth?



Comment