Lots of my customers are very, very intelligent. Smart as whips, they are. Pinnacles of humanity, the lot of them.
That being said, it's completely understandable when they try to explain the inner workings of my company to me. In light of this, I'm sure you can all understand why conversations like the one below do not bother me at all.
Prof. Dumbass: Weren't you guys bought by Blockbuster?
Me: No. About a year ago Blockbuster tried to obtain control of the Hollywood Entertainment Corporation in a hostile takeover, but it didn't work.
Prof. Dumbass: Isn't that the same as buying the company?
Me: No. A hostile takeover is when a company tries to take over a company whether the management of said company wants them to or not. Usually it's accomplished by buying large amounts of publically available stock. It's rather difficult to do unless the company on the offensive has a great deal of buying power and the defensive company's stocks have high liquidity.
Prof. Dumbass: So Blockbuster bought you?
Me: No. To prevent Blockbuster from taking over Hollywood using that stock-buying tactic that I explained to you a second ago, we merged with Movie Gallery.
Prof. Dumbass: Oh, that's Blockbuster. I told you they bought you.
Me: No, it's not Blockbuster. It's the third largest movie rental chain in the country, we're the second largest, Blockbuster is the first."
Prof. Dumbass: But aren't you guys all the same company since Blockbuster bought you?
Me: No, they didn't buy us. If they had bought us after the merger with Movie Gallery, they would own all the major movie rental chains in America and therefore they would be in violation of anti-trust laws. That's why we merged with Movie Gallery in the first place, to prevent them from taking control of the company.
Prof. Dumbass: ...
Me: ...
Prof. Dumbass: I'm pretty sure you're wrong. I read that Blockbuster bought you. You should ask your manager, he'll tell you.
A perfectly legitimate conversation, about which I am not bitter. At all. You will just not believe how not bitter I am. I am the anti-bitter, if you will.
Please shoot me...
That being said, it's completely understandable when they try to explain the inner workings of my company to me. In light of this, I'm sure you can all understand why conversations like the one below do not bother me at all.
Prof. Dumbass: Weren't you guys bought by Blockbuster?
Me: No. About a year ago Blockbuster tried to obtain control of the Hollywood Entertainment Corporation in a hostile takeover, but it didn't work.
Prof. Dumbass: Isn't that the same as buying the company?
Me: No. A hostile takeover is when a company tries to take over a company whether the management of said company wants them to or not. Usually it's accomplished by buying large amounts of publically available stock. It's rather difficult to do unless the company on the offensive has a great deal of buying power and the defensive company's stocks have high liquidity.
Prof. Dumbass: So Blockbuster bought you?
Me: No. To prevent Blockbuster from taking over Hollywood using that stock-buying tactic that I explained to you a second ago, we merged with Movie Gallery.
Prof. Dumbass: Oh, that's Blockbuster. I told you they bought you.
Me: No, it's not Blockbuster. It's the third largest movie rental chain in the country, we're the second largest, Blockbuster is the first."
Prof. Dumbass: But aren't you guys all the same company since Blockbuster bought you?
Me: No, they didn't buy us. If they had bought us after the merger with Movie Gallery, they would own all the major movie rental chains in America and therefore they would be in violation of anti-trust laws. That's why we merged with Movie Gallery in the first place, to prevent them from taking control of the company.
Prof. Dumbass: ...
Me: ...
Prof. Dumbass: I'm pretty sure you're wrong. I read that Blockbuster bought you. You should ask your manager, he'll tell you.
A perfectly legitimate conversation, about which I am not bitter. At all. You will just not believe how not bitter I am. I am the anti-bitter, if you will.
Please shoot me...



I have almost the exact same problem. In western Canada, there were two movie chains, Cineplex Odeon and Famous Players, in eastern Canada, there was also Empire Theatres. Famous Players was being sold off by its parent company. CO's parent company decided to buy FP. However, This would give them a monopoly in western Canada. CO then proceeded to place some of the theatres in each area up for sale. ET decided they wanted to expand to the rest of Canada and bought all these theatres. The problem is, since noone has ever heard of ET in western Canada before, and the purchase of FP by CO was highly publisized, everyone thinks there is just one theatre chain, just with different faces. This leads to many people trying to use their cheap CO passes at my theatre, which is one that was sold to ET A YEAR AGO, and trying to argue with me that in fact, we were bought by CO, and not sold by them. It's gotten to the point where I can quote the timeline to them in under a minute, coherently, and easily understandable. And some of them still don't believe me.
Comment