Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So, this happened to another driver last night...

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Leopardmadcat
    replied
    Then again the defendant will now know YOU personally and other such details like where you live and work... If he's already got numerous criminal complaints against him what's preventing him from taking revenge on you? Cops are utterly useless in such matters, they can only 'protect' you AFTER the damage has been done... and usually not even then.
    Last edited by Boozy; 07-30-2008, 11:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyphr
    replied
    ^ even if you lose money in the process if someone has to go through smalls claims more than once they'll probaly stop hurting stuff

    Leave a comment:


  • tropicsgoddess
    replied
    IANAL either, but I do agree with wagegoth on the the fact that it will take G more time and money to pursue TT in small claims court. I sincerely hope that management would consider banning TT.

    Leave a comment:


  • wagegoth
    replied
    Small claims court is a lot more trouble than an arrest. G will have to file the case and pay a filing fee, then serve TT (probably have to pay someone to do that), wait for a court date, appear, possibly appear more than once if TT gets the hearing date postponed, actually state his case before a judge, including preparing a clear statement of the loss, including pictures, and the budget to replace it, along with all fees incurred in the small claims process, then cross his fingers the judge agrees, and if G wins he than has to figure out how to collect his money from TT, as that is usually the responsibility of the winning party.

    IMHO, IANAL, however, I have been through small claims as a plaintiff. It will take hours and hours of G's time and a chunk of money, probably much more than the taillight would cost to replace, to pursue TT.

    Leave a comment:


  • SpyOne
    replied
    When I worked for a franchise of .... a major national pizza chain, we did occasionally ban customers.
    The list was short, so we never had trouble keeping track.

    There was one lady who proved impossible to please, so we told her she was outside our area, and to call the other store.

    For bad behavior (such as described in the original post), we banned the neighborhood.
    "Oh, I'm sorry but we don't deliver to Clark Street anymore. Well, it seems that one of your neighbors attacked one of our drivers."
    This was remarkably effective. We were the only place in town that delivered, and ....
    No matter how thug you think you are, the knowledge that all of your equally thug neighbors will resent you making it impossible for them to order a pizza for six weeks means you keep your hands off the Pizza Guy.

    Leave a comment:


  • gasstationguy
    replied
    Problem delivery customers

    When I worked at a pizza place, we used to keep a list of adresses that we did not deliver too. The list was posted on the wall in the phone area. It was not a long list, so it was easy for the person taking orders to remember.

    Leave a comment:


  • penguingeekgod
    replied
    Quoth bainsidhe View Post
    Ah Damn. Shoulda had TT arrested, I say. Does your drive have insurance? Shouldn't it be partly up to insurance to sue this guy? Of course, then the driver would have the deductable plus the insurance companies tend to frown on increased driving time, such as what a delivery driver has. Suck all around, I guess. I with you all luck getting payment from this lowlife.
    He only has liability because it is the standard pizza beater. He didn't want to arrest him because it would be too much trouble in his opinion.

    Quoth BrightEyedKitty View Post
    Um, I'm not sure what exactly you mean by that, considering G was born and raised in Ohio, and isn't exactly a young kid...and as someone who knows G personally, I can tell you that "passive" isn't the first thing that comes to mind when I think of him.
    Ditto that.

    Quoth Peppergirl View Post
    The sad part is that if it's one of the big 3 (Papa Johns, Pizza Hut, Dominos) and a corporate store, they won't.

    Please keep us updated!

    There is a loophole in that. If a driver feels that their safety is threatened, we don't have to deliver it so long as there is a legitimate concern. This case gives legitimate concern, thus federal law states the driver can refuse to grant service as it would reasonable constitute a hostile work environment.
    Last edited by Boozy; 07-30-2008, 11:58 PM. Reason: merging consecutive posts

    Leave a comment:


  • penguingeekgod
    replied
    Quoth Evil Queen View Post


    Uh, please do. Holy Hell, your place needs to black list that guy!
    I don't know of a blacklist for anything other than checks.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrightEyedKitty
    replied
    Quoth dithers66
    I can tell he's gonna have a rough life living in the States.
    Um, I'm not sure what exactly you mean by that, considering G was born and raised in Ohio, and isn't exactly a young kid...and as someone who knows G personally, I can tell you that "passive" isn't the first thing that comes to mind when I think of him.

    Leave a comment:


  • bainsidhe
    replied
    Ah Damn. Shoulda had TT arrested, I say. Does your drive have insurance? Shouldn't it be partly up to insurance to sue this guy? Of course, then the driver would have the deductable plus the insurance companies tend to frown on increased driving time, such as what a delivery driver has. Suck all around, I guess. I with you all luck getting payment from this lowlife.

    Leave a comment:


  • orpheuswaking
    replied
    Hmmm... I worked for a Corporate PJ and we banned people left right and center. I also worked for a LARGE franchise chain of PH (about 50 or so stores) and we banned people too.

    Leave a comment:


  • karma_gypsy
    replied
    It doesn't seem like "TT" will probably even show up to court. He'll probably think the damage is too insignificant (errr, "stoopid").

    Leave a comment:


  • dithers66
    replied
    G is obviously not thinking this through since small claims probably won't mean much to a TT like this. G seems a very passive person and I can tell he's gonna have a rough life living in the States.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrightEyedKitty
    replied
    Quoth Evil Queen
    Holy Hell, your place needs to black list that guy!
    That's what I said to the boss. She's unsure at the moment whether she will or not. In fact, she gave them a credit before she heard the whole story from G.

    (For the record, I work for this store as well, making PGG a co-worker of mine.)

    Quoth Peppergirl
    The sad part is that if it's one of the big 3 (Papa Johns, Pizza Hut, Dominos) and a corporate store, they won't.
    We're not part of a Big 3 chain, though we are part of a fairly sizeable local chain that's expanded to several other states in recent years. Still, to ban someone from ordering entirely is rare.

    Glad to know G is taking some action. I only got the basics from the boss because she didn't want to go into the whole story yet again. Now I know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peppergirl
    replied
    Quoth Evil Queen View Post


    Uh, please do. Holy Hell, your place needs to black list that guy!
    The sad part is that if it's one of the big 3 (Papa Johns, Pizza Hut, Dominos) and a corporate store, they won't.

    Please keep us updated!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X