Normally for various obvious legal reasons i can't discuss things that happen at work however, i have now had the exact same situation occur three times, so i'm no longer talking about any one individual.
Previously: A homeless man is moved on from a public place (Train Station, Bus Station, etc) during which he becaomes abusive and threaten security/police with the weapon he is carrying. Man is then charged with carrying a dangerous weapon and has it confiscated.
Magistrates Court: Man is charged with several offences many of which are written off on the day of the hearing (i'm not sure if the American lawyers work the same way) in return he pleads guilty on the charge of carrying a dangerous weapon and is cautioned (basically a telling off)
The Weapon itself is not a gun or a knife but a homemade bat of somesort usually several pages of newspaper inside a napkin ring. The defendat has ample time between the origainal incident and the court case to fashion a new weapon exactly the same as previous and BRINGS IT INTO COURT.
You get searched at the entrance of any court building yet somehow the defendants manage to get through with the weapon every time.
I'm not sure who is more sucky the defendants for not realising that if you are being prosecuted for carrying a paticular weapon, showing that you still carry the same weapon and have no reservations about bringing it into a court or the Security guards who let it through the entrance.
*Seriously paper in a napkin ring can be as dangerous as a wood/metal pole
Previously: A homeless man is moved on from a public place (Train Station, Bus Station, etc) during which he becaomes abusive and threaten security/police with the weapon he is carrying. Man is then charged with carrying a dangerous weapon and has it confiscated.
Magistrates Court: Man is charged with several offences many of which are written off on the day of the hearing (i'm not sure if the American lawyers work the same way) in return he pleads guilty on the charge of carrying a dangerous weapon and is cautioned (basically a telling off)
The Weapon itself is not a gun or a knife but a homemade bat of somesort usually several pages of newspaper inside a napkin ring. The defendat has ample time between the origainal incident and the court case to fashion a new weapon exactly the same as previous and BRINGS IT INTO COURT.
You get searched at the entrance of any court building yet somehow the defendants manage to get through with the weapon every time.
I'm not sure who is more sucky the defendants for not realising that if you are being prosecuted for carrying a paticular weapon, showing that you still carry the same weapon and have no reservations about bringing it into a court or the Security guards who let it through the entrance.
*Seriously paper in a napkin ring can be as dangerous as a wood/metal pole
Comment