There must be a statement somewhere that says whether it's the parent's or the store's responsibility when a child gets hurt on the premises. If it's the parent's responsibility, the parent should be legally held responsible for any damage caused by a child; if it's the store's responsibility, the company should stand behind any employee who tells a kid to behave (when the so-called parental unit isn't doing its job).
I know it probably falls under the heading of things that make sense and are therefore simply not done... but this is heading out of the realm of 'common sense' (which we all know corporate and legal executives are lacking) and into the realm of 'economic sense' (because it prevents product loss and lawsuits).
I know it probably falls under the heading of things that make sense and are therefore simply not done... but this is heading out of the realm of 'common sense' (which we all know corporate and legal executives are lacking) and into the realm of 'economic sense' (because it prevents product loss and lawsuits).




. But at least his parents realized that, hey, things happen with kids and weren't upset with us.
. Is there anything we can do to make your job easier for you? Tidy up? Anything?"
). Luckily, manager (who was one of those doting mothers) was able to get a phone number off of the girl and call the girls' grandmother. Needless to say, girl didn't leave the sight of the manager until grandma came and got her.
Comment