creepy smelly old man!

[blas]

I'd rather not become infamous for best imitation of the speed dating woman on 40 Year Old Virgin.

[Evandril]

Having an ill fitting bikini and a wiley boyfriend are a dangerous combo in a public pool anyway.

I think we need proof of the first part

[blas]

That's why I liked the private whirlpool rooms. Not a pool, but it's too cold this time of year to go in a pool, even indoors, IMO.

Having an ill fitting bikini and a wiley boyfriend are a dangerous combo in a public pool anyway.

[EricKei]

If it's illegal to be nude in public, then being nude on private property that is accessible to the public should still be illegal.

Agreed

Some people will try to make that distinction, however. Ultimately, it's up to the hotel owners in this case...Tho I suspect that passers-by would not care if they saw drunk, clothed people at the pool, nekkid ones might provoke a different reaction entirely

[wagegoth]

wg - good point. However, I was referring to the nudity, not the drunkenness.

As was I. If it's illegal to be nude in public, then being nude on private property that is accessible to the public should still be illegal.

[EricKei]

wg - good point. However, I was referring to the nudity, not the drunkenness.

[wagegoth]

As for the people swimming in their birthday suits -- check the hotel policy on it. If it is not specifically allowed, ask guests to formally complain so you can call the cops on their behalf. Private property means that they may not be chargeable with Public Indecency (unless the pool is somewhere that people on the sidewalk could see them in all their glory), BUT local laws probably do say something about doing that with kids in the vicinity, private property or no. Check your local laws on this.

You can be drunk in public on private property that is accessible to the public, meaning bars and restaurants, so it should not make a difference that the pool is on private property. Businesses normally have the right to refuse service to anyone as long as the reason for it has nothing to do with the person's membership in a protected class.

[PepperElf]

Only we were....and I may have yelled something that one never says in front of kids...and not two seconds later kids ran down the hallway yelling.

Were they repeating what you said?

BUT local laws probably do say something about doing that with kids* in the vicinity, private property or no.

*fixed it for ya

but seriously that is a good point. i know in virginia exposing children to sexual material can get you on the offender list so... that could be stretched to indecent exposure, just perhaps not public etc.

[EricKei]

On the food thing - that IS a health code violation -- technically you have to throw out the entire pan of whatever he poked (besides, it doesn't sound like he washes his hands...period). A case could easily be made for keeping him away from the food on the basis on how much money it would cost the hotel to dump a pan of each thing he's poked *every single day* (print up the relevant law before actually tossing anything, but make sure the boss sees the food being tossed (after all, it's best to have a manager witness such things to make sure it's all on the up and up ) AND knows why it's happening...).

Also, maybe consider surreptitiously encouraging other guests to complain about him, en masse, in writing -- especially with regards to the food thing. It's obvious the boss doesn't care if El Creepo Magnifico disgusts/worries you guys...Maybe he'll listen to paying customers.

As for the people swimming in their birthday suits -- check the hotel policy on it. If it is not specifically allowed, ask guests to formally complain so you can call the cops on their behalf. Private property means that they may not be chargeable with Public Indecency (unless the pool is somewhere that people on the sidewalk could see them in all their glory), BUT local laws probably do say something about doing that with kids in the vicinity, private property or no. Check your local laws on this.

All of these misbehaving people are the same bottom 5% of SC's that hurt every other business. Losing their patronage will likely make the other 95% happier and more willing to stay longer, spend money, and come back in the future.

[raudf]

I'd go with the anonymous call to Adult Protective Services myself. He should meet the criteria for inspection by a councilor. Maybe they'll get him placed elsewhere.. preferably where he gets the treatments he needs.

[wagegoth]

Would Adult Protective Services do anything?

It would have to be an anonymous call, I suppose.

[bhskittykatt]

Ew.

Sounds like many long-term guests we've had in the past. However, they were all too paranoid to leave their rooms much to bother anyone.

Unfortunately, it can very hard to kick them out if they're considered a permanent guest. Usually you just have to grin and bear it and hope they just go away.

[taxguykarl]

If OMS is buddy-buddy with Mr. Creepy, it may be nigh-impossible to get him evicted.

XC is right, you'll have an easier time getting him arrested.

[XCashier]

Eeeeeeeew is all I have to say about Mr. Creepy Can you get him evicted (health concern at the very least, especially with touching all the food), or does OMS need to be the one to make that call? (you could probably do it anonymously, or one of the other guests might be willing to)

If OMS is buddy-buddy with Mr. Creepy, it may be nigh-impossible to get him evicted.

[starsinthesky]

Been there.

Only we were....and I may have yelled something that one never says in front of kids...and not two seconds later kids ran down the hallway yelling.