Since I can't talk to my wife about "The Last Jedi" yet (because she hasn't seen it yet, and no spoilers!) we started talking about ROTJ.
Recall that Vader was trying to turn Luke to the Dark Side, and was delivering him to the Emperor.
But the Sith "rule of two" dictates that there's always a Master and an Apprentice.
So that brings up a few questions:
1. How do Sith spread? It would seem like there would be a limited number of them, since there's 1 master and 1 apprentice. The Jedi don't seem to have such a rule.
2. The Emperor could easily "end" (i.e. kill) Vader AND Luke. Though I do believe in certain respects Vader was more powerful than the Emperor -- and the Emperor knew it.
3. Vader suggested, as an attempt to "turn" Luke, that they kill the Emperor and rule the galaxy "as father and son" (IIRC). It's possible that Vader meant that Luke should kill the Emperor (as one more step to turning to the Dark Side).
4. The Emperor tried to goad Luke into killing Vader. Luke didn't, which led to Vader/Anakin's "redemption".
So would Vader have just been cast aside, or what? Because recall, too, that Vader actually kept Luke from killing the Emperor.
I don't think the three of them could have functioned, given the rule of two.
Recall that Vader was trying to turn Luke to the Dark Side, and was delivering him to the Emperor.
But the Sith "rule of two" dictates that there's always a Master and an Apprentice.
So that brings up a few questions:
1. How do Sith spread? It would seem like there would be a limited number of them, since there's 1 master and 1 apprentice. The Jedi don't seem to have such a rule.
2. The Emperor could easily "end" (i.e. kill) Vader AND Luke. Though I do believe in certain respects Vader was more powerful than the Emperor -- and the Emperor knew it.
3. Vader suggested, as an attempt to "turn" Luke, that they kill the Emperor and rule the galaxy "as father and son" (IIRC). It's possible that Vader meant that Luke should kill the Emperor (as one more step to turning to the Dark Side).
4. The Emperor tried to goad Luke into killing Vader. Luke didn't, which led to Vader/Anakin's "redemption".
So would Vader have just been cast aside, or what? Because recall, too, that Vader actually kept Luke from killing the Emperor.
I don't think the three of them could have functioned, given the rule of two.

I AM the evil bastard!

Comment