If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I can't believe the manager would still let this guy eat there after being aggressive.
I hate that the manager sat the guy, but I understand why. Had he actually gotten physical with the employee, and a report had to be made with the corporate higher-ups (if there are any) about it, the higher-ups would've wanted to know why the manager didn't diffuse the situation.
Corporate can't control crazy customers (say that five times fast!), but they can control their managers.
This story really ticked me off as well, and I agree the poor employee was not only thrown under the bus but run over several times. If you read the replies to this story you'll see they are uniform in that this clown should NOT have been rewarded for his actions but should have been immediately told to leave and not return.
If I'd been in line and seen this asshat get seated before me I would have immediately registered a complaint with the manger before leaving, and inform corporate and the media exactly why I would not be eating there again...
I can't believe the manager would still let this guy eat there after being aggressive.
That made me mad. I would've loudly expressed my disgust that the manager threw the employee under the bus and rewarded the jerk for his threatening behavior, said I wouldn't dine anyplace that does that, and walk out. It'd be nice if the folks behind me did the same thing. Might get through that manager's skull.
It appears the same story has been posted twice, from both perspectives.
Anyone want to guess which is the correct one?
Well, if the comments on the posts are to be believed, the NAW version is the accurate account, and the NAR version was someone attempting to troll the story-submitter/customer.
Leave a comment: